April Projects

21-April-2010

  1. Continue to fix SL5 compilation and configuration issues as they are discovered. Expect this to take a dozen hours or so the first week, dropping off substantially thereafter.
  2. Get development into proper SRT release shape. Lynn says from 2-14 days, as most of the work is already done. Other demands on her time may dominate.
  3. Get 7.0.1 into new SRT framework and fix compilation issues. Lynn says from 2-7 days. I found a few odd compilation problems, but these are probably known already. (I pulled it to Wisconsin and tried to compile there.)
  4. Plan for May projects

List and who

  1. Fixing configuration issues: Lynn
  2. Development into SRT release form: Lynn
  3. Compilation fixes in development: Lynn says she is best to do this, but I see a lot of things with her name on them already.
  4. Development-lite discussion: All. I thought this was not going to be a problem, but perhaps I'm wrong
  5. Products for development; check and recommend: ?
  6. 7.0.1 configuration repair and getting this into SRT release form: Lynn
  7. Compilation fixes in 7.0.1 on SL5: JNB?
  8. Products for 7.0.1; check if OK for SL4/5: ?
  9. 10K validation for 7.0.1: ?
  10. root cross-platform read/write and stress tests: ?

Notes

development should probably turn into development.migrate for testing, then we backport everything to development and use that.

We agree that development-lite is not broken and won't break and remote sites that don't do a cron update ought to.

radon and bld4_nfs distribute SL3 and SL4 respectively.

cdfcode and bld4 build SL3 and SL4 respectively

bld5 builds and distributes SL5--though the latter is not fully tested because it is also a build machine

By August at the latest all farm machines should be SL5

General plan by most to keep building SL3 development until August I'm not persuaded that this is necessary--I thought SOP was to pull the code from the head and build locally, not pull libraries. Can we find out?

We agree that 7.0.1 only requires 10K for our .m release, for the physics testing. I still say we need a more thorough shakedown for root interoperability--provided this has not already been done. But nobody has told me yet where this was tested.

cdfcode also has

  1. code browser: Donatella and Lammel Is sam browser fixed?

    Donatella says the code browser and the postgres DB and the dedicated web service are all on cdfcode. It may be possible to add non-cdfsoft directories, but 11-May is earliest she can work on this.

  2. Some distribution tar files. Lynn to move them. Needs to have a different home than the build??
  3. Web pages somewhere?
  4. Database for code browser?
  5. Database for what else?
  6. sam update (for sam browser, which doesn't work, so why is this running?)
  7. update_dcaf--what is this for?

    postgres /usr/bin/postmaster -p 5432 -D /var/lib/pgsql/data
    postgres postgres: stats buffer process
    postgres postgres: stats collector process

    cdfsoft /bin/sh /home/cdfsoft/pull_dbstats
    cdfsoft tee /home/cdfsoft/maint/log/dbstats/work.log
    cdfsoft /usr/sbin/sendmail -FCronDaemon -i -odi -oem -oi -t
    cdfsoft /usr/krb5/bin/rcp -X cdfdb fcdfweb.fnal.gov /cdf/work/mysqldata/remoteLogServer/archive/dbsmonsum_mysql_20100426.tar.gz /cdf/spool/cdfsoft/Backups/dbstats/dbsmonsum_mysql_20100426.tar.gz


  • Search and see

    April Decisions

    21-April-2010

    1. When do we stop building on SL3?
      • After validation of 7.0.1
      • Why do we have nightly builds? If the release was frozen, shouldn't it only need a rebuild-check if something has changed in the OS?
    2. Which SL3 hardware needs to be returned, which discarded, and which can be reloaded?
    3. Do we need new machines for the ILP? Guessing we can continue with the current non-SL3 build machines.
    4. Do we argue for a new release? And if so, based on 6.1 or 7.0? (I would, and barring surprises, based on 7.0.1)