Slides and Notes 27-May-2009

Look at the raw shifts as seen in the first step of Cocoa for 3.8T data. Bear in mind that the disks bend, and the ME+3 and ME+2 stations are on the same disk--one cantilevered up and the other cantilevered down.

Name.5*(U+D)-midsign*(.5*(U+D)-mid).5*(L+R)-mid
DCOPS_MEp4_transfer_1_OUT-1.32365-1.32365-0.28055
DCOPS_MEp3_transfer_1_OUT3.082753.082752.2526
DCOPS_MEp2_transfer_1_OUT1.50461.50462.8822
DCOPS_MEp1_transfer_1_OUT2.44242.44248.61085
DCOPS_MEp4_transfer_2_IN-0.08750.0875-0.362
DCOPS_MEp3_transfer_2_IN-5.224245.224241.2839
DCOPS_MEp2_transfer_2_IN-3.776753.776752.131
DCOPS_MEp1_transfer_2_OUT9.049959.049958.4498
DCOPS_MEp4_transfer_3_OUT-0.53955-0.53955-0.1342
DCOPS_MEp3_transfer_3_OUT5.94645.9464-0.1873
DCOPS_MEp2_transfer_3_OUT4.180154.180153.13985
DCOPS_MEp1_transfer_3_IN-4.202834.202838.21575
DCOPS_MEp4_transfer_4_IN0.70725-0.70725-1.12795
DCOPS_MEp3_transfer_4_IN-5.411525.411520.77895
DCOPS_MEp2_transfer_4_IN-3.68353.68350.62995
DCOPS_MEp1_transfer_4_IN-2.40092.40094.6905
DCOPS_MEp4_transfer_5_OUT0.380650.38065-0.7438
DCOPS_MEp3_transfer_5_IN-6.619646.619642.91575
DCOPS_MEp2_transfer_5_OUT4.649554.649552.26265
DCOPS_MEp1_transfer_5_OUT2.59062.59067.15335
DCOPS_MEp4_transfer_6_IN-0.328150.32815-0.97065
DCOPS_MEp3_transfer_6_IN-6.298246.298243.6235
DCOPS_MEp2_transfer_6_IN-4.83844.83842.37545
DCOPS_MEp1_transfer_6_OUT5.844155.844154.8923

Sign represents "motion of DCOPS"

Use OPPOSITE sign to get disk motion

The average L/R for a position is independent of the orientation of the DCOPS. Averaging loses information about the tilt of the laser beam, but that's not a concern here. Notice that the position increases the farther from the laser the sensor is, which is consistent with tilts in the laser direction. These tilts vary with transfer point, and of course are not indicative of anything important, since the tilts were adjusted. They are 3.41, 3.38, 3.20, 2.23, 3.03, and 2.25 mrad respectively.

The average U/D (adjusted for DCOPS orientation) is more interesting, since it allows us to get rough estimates of the disk rotations. If the laser is directed down the line accurately, the shifts represent real shifts in the disk position. Imagine for the sake of estimation that the transfer plates are precisely where they are supposed to be and the lasers are directed straight down the middle. Then the average position for each disk in U/D (adjusted) represents an approximation for the rotation of that disk. Obviously YE+3 should have no rotation, since the lasers are mounted on it, so that gives us an estimate of the error involved.

The fact that the lasers are not directly perfectly is partly compensated for by the fact that these misdirections are random, to first order.

This gives a rotation for YE+3 of -.25mrad, for YE+2 of 0.64mrad, and for YE+1 of 0.61mrad. Disk rotation would be YE+1=-.61, YE+2=-.64, YE+3=.25mrad, the first 2 of which agree with photogrammetry

If I regard each shift in U/D as a vector and sum them (multiplying by the appropriate unit vector for each position), the positions turn out to be
NamedX mmdY mmrotZ mrad
YE+1-0.850.480.61
YE+20.34-0.350.64
YE+30.18-0.01-0.25

Obviously these are very coarse approximations--not trustworthy. But they can be used to estimate the size of the displacements.

I can do the same thing with the L/R numbers, and so for comparison
NameU/D dX mmL/R dX mmU/D dY mmL/R dY mm
YE+1-0.850.300.480.77
YE+20.340.44-0.35-0.24
YE+30.180.05-0.010.20

The YE+2 numbers are consistent, but not the YE+1.


Summary:


Modified 28-May-2009 at 9:13

http://hep.physics.wisc.edu/~jnb/cms/27May2009
Previous notes Next notes Main slide directory

Please contact jnbt@hep.physics.wisc.edu if you have trouble accessing the information on this page.